Yeager
AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Yeager
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 AT&T MOBILITY LLC, No. 2:13-cv-00007-KJM-DAD 6 Plaintiff, No. 2:14-cv-02544-KJM-DB 7 v. 8 GENERAL CHARLES E. “CHUCK” ORDER
YEAGER (RET.); ED BOWLIN; CONNIE
9 BOWLIN; AVIATION AUTOGRAPHS;
BOWLIN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.; LAW
10 OFFICES OF JOANNA R. MENDOZA,
P.C.; DE LA PENA & HOLIDAY, LLP;
11 LESSER LAW GROUP, 12 Defendants. 13 PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER, PLC, 14 Plaintiff-in-Intervention, 15 v. 16 GENERAL CHARLES E. “CHUCK”
YEAGER (RET.),
17
18 Defendant-in-Intervention.
19 20 Plaintiff-in-Intervention Parsons Behle & Latimer, PLC (“Parsons Behle”) moves 21 to enforce a global settlement agreement in two related cases stemming from Gen. Charles E. 22 Yeager’s underlying case against AT&T for infringing his right to publicity. Mot. Enforce 23 Settlement, AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Yeager et al., No. 2:13-cv-00007-KJM-DAD (“Interpleader 24 Case”), ECF No. 410; Mot. Enforce Settlement, Yeager et al. v. Parsons Behle & Latimer et al., 25 …