(PS) Yeager v. Parsons Behle & Latimer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 8, 20202:14-cv-02544California3,706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 AT&T MOBILITY LLC, No. 2:13-cv-00007-KJM-DAD Plaintiff, No. 2:14-cv-02544-KJM-DB v. GENERAL CHARLES E. “CHUCK” ORDER

YEAGER (RET.); ED BOWLIN; CONNIE

BOWLIN; AVIATION AUTOGRAPHS;

BOWLIN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.; LAW

OFFICES OF JOANNA R. MENDOZA,

P.C.; DE LA PENA & HOLIDAY, LLP;

LESSER LAW GROUP, Defendants. PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER, PLC, Plaintiff-in-Intervention, v. GENERAL CHARLES E. “CHUCK”

YEAGER (RET.),

Defendant-in-Intervention.

19 Plaintiff-in-Intervention Parsons Behle & Latimer, PLC (“Parsons Behle”) moves to enforce a global settlement agreement in two related cases stemming from Gen. Charles E. Yeager’s underlying case against AT&T for infringing his right to publicity. Mot. Enforce Settlement, AT&T Mobility, LLC v. Yeager et al., No. 2:13-cv-00007-KJM-DAD (“Interpleader Case”), ECF No. 410; Mot. Enforce Settlement, Yeager et al. v. Parsons Behle & Latimer et al., 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.