Taylor
Taylor v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL TAYLOR, No. 2:20-cv-00655-KJM-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER COSTCO WHOLESALE
CORPORATION,
15 Defendant.
17 Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Costco”) moves to dismiss plaintiff Paul Taylor’s complaint. Mot., ECF No. 7. The motion is fully briefed. Opp’n, ECF No. 10; Reply, ECF No. 11. Defendant requested judicial notice of a number of documents. “RJN”, ECF No. 9. Plaintiff filed a notice of supplemental authority. ECF No. 21.2 The court submitted the motion on the papers and resolves it here. 23 1 The court denies the request, as the documents it covers are not relevant to the court’s resolution of the motion. See, e.g., Santa Monica Food Not Bombs v. City of Santa Monica, 450 F.3d 1022, 1025 n.2 (9th Cir. 2006) (district court may deny request for judicial notice where facts not 25 relevant to question at issue). 26 In that case, Weeks v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., No. 19-6780, a district court in the Central District of…