(PC) Gradford v. Stanislaus Public Safety Center
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WILLIAM J. GRADFORD, 1:17-cv-01248-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF
v. NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT
FLORES’S MOTION TO DISMISS,
STANISLAUS PUBLIC SAFETY WITHIN TWENTY-ONE DAYS CENTER, et al., (ECF No. 54.) Defendants.
19 William J. Gradford (“Plaintiff”) is a former prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds against defendant Sergeant Flores1 (“Defendant”) for use of excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On September 8, 2020, defendant Flores filed a motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 54.) Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 230(l).
28 1 Sued as Sergeant Florres. Local Rule 230(l) provides that the failure to oppose a motion “may be deemed a waiver of any…