Patel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY D. PADILLA, 1:19-cv-00837-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE

vs. BE DISMISSED, WITHOUT

PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE TO OBEY

DR. PATEL, et al., COURT ORDER (ECF No. 10.) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

20 On August 21, 2020, the Court issued an order dismissing Plaintiff’s Complaint for violation of Rule 18, with leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (ECF No. 10.) The thirty-day time period has now expired and Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the Court’s order. In determining whether to dismiss this action for failure to comply with the directives set forth in its order, “the Court must weigh the following factors: (1) the public’s interest in expeditious resolution of litigation; (2) the court’s need to manage its docket; (3)…