Barnes

Barnes v. Yand

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20201:20-cv-00389California1,281 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES, Case No. 1:20-cv-00389-DAD-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

13 v. TO PROVIDE FURTHER INFORMATION

REGARDING DEFENDANT TO

14 W. YAND, et al., EFFECTUATE SERVICE OF SUMMONS

AND COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING THE

15 Defendants. CLERK OF THE COURT TO UPDATE

PLAINTIFF’S ADDRESS

16

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

17 18 Antoine Deshawn Barnes (“Plaintiff) is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this 19 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 10, 2020, an order was filed finding 20 that service was appropriate on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendant Yand for 21 an illegal search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment and, upon return of the 22 service documents, the United States Marshal was ordered to serve the summons and complaint. 23 (ECF Nos. 12, 15.) 24 On September 9, 2020, the United States Marshal returned the service documents with 25 the notation that no one by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.