City of Sacramento v. Wells Fargo & Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20202:18-cv-00416California2,817 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, No. 2:18-cv-00416-KJM-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER WELLS FARGO & CO., and WELLS

FARGO BANK, N.A.,

15 Defendants.

17 Defendants Wells Fargo & Co. and Wells Fargo Bank N.A. (“collectively “Wells Fargo”) move to phase discovery. Mot., ECF No. 52. The City of Sacramento opposes. Opp’n, ECF No. 56. Wells Fargo has replied. Reply, ECF No. 58. The court heard oral argument from the parties on March 6, 2020. At the hearing, Robert Peck and Yosef Peretz appeared for the City of Sacramento; Olivia Kelman, Paul Hancock and Edward Sangster appeared for Wells Fargo. The novel coronavirus pandemic has intervened since hearing, but the court now resolves the motion and DENIES it as explained below. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff City of Sacramento (“City”) sues Wells Fargo for violations of the federal Fair Housing Act (FHA) and California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). Plaintiff alleges that since…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.