(PC) Hernandez v. Mule Creek State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20202:20-cv-01115California270 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PABLO HERNANDEZ, No. 2:20-cv-1115 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND 14 MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 15 Defendants. 16 17 By order filed July 8, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. The 18 deadline for filing an amended complaint has passed and plaintiff has not filed an amended 19 complaint. 20 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district 21 court judge to this case; and 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 23 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after 26 being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with 27 the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.