Singh

(PC) Uhuru v. Singh

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20202:20-cv-01664California2,039 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KOHEN DIALLO UHURU, No. 2: 20-cv-1664 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

R. SINGH, et al., Defendants. 16 Introduction Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 17, 2020, the undersigned recommended that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied on the grounds that plaintiff had three strikes pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (ECF No. 8.) The undersigned also found that plaintiff did not meet the “imminent danger” exception to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Id.) On September 30, 2020, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 9.) In his objections, plaintiff alleges sufficient facts demonstrating that he may meet the imminent danger exception as to his claim alleging that defendant Scamurra provided inadequate dental care. (Id.) Accordingly, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.