Singh

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KOHEN DIALLO UHURU, No. 2: 20-cv-1664 TLN KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 R. SINGH, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Introduction 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 19 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 17, 2020, the undersigned recommended that plaintiff’s 20 application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied on the grounds that plaintiff had three strikes 21 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (ECF No. 8.) The undersigned also found that plaintiff did not 22 meet the “imminent danger” exception to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Id.) 23 On September 30, 2020, plaintiff filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 (ECF No. 9.) In his objections, plaintiff alleges sufficient facts demonstrating that he may meet 25 the imminent danger exception as to his claim alleging that defendant Scamurra provided 26 inadequate dental care. (Id.) Accordingly, the…