(PS) Sharma v. Home Buyers Realty and HBR Rentals

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20202:20-cv-00940California2,016 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JANAVI SHARMA, No. 2:20-cv-0940 TLN DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 HOME BUYERS REALTY AND HBR RENTALS, et al., 15 16 Defendants, 17 18 Plaintiff Janavi Sharma is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the 19 undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending 20 before the court are plaintiff’s complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 21 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) Therein, plaintiff complains about being evicted. 22 The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma 23 pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 24 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiff’s complaint is deficient. Accordingly, for the reasons stated 25 below, plaintiff’s complaint will be dismissed with leave to amend. 26 I. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 27 Plaintiff’s in forma pauperis…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.