Gomez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK SHANE THOMPSON, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-00125-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND ) MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, v. ) WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND GRANTING

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO

A. GOMEZ, et al., ) OUTSTANDING DISCOVERY REQUESTS ) Defendants. ) (ECF No. 71) ) )

Plaintiff Mark Shane Thompson is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s second motion for appointment of counsel, filed October 7, 2020. Plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the court cannot require any attorney to represent plaintiff pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Mallard v. United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). …