Salazar
(PC) Bland v. Salazar
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSHUA D. BLAND, Case No. 1:19-cv-01499-NONE-EPG (PC)
12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S
13 v. MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF BE
DENIED
14 REUBEN A. SALAZAR II, (ECF No. 30) 15 Defendant.
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
16 FOURTEEN DAYS 17
18 Joshua Bland (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 19 this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s 20 claim against defendant Reuben A. Salazar II for violation of Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment 21 right to due process. (ECF No. 32). 22 On September 25, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for injunctive relief. (ECF No. 30). 23 For the reasons that follow, the Court will recommend that Plaintiff’s motion be denied. 24 I. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 25 Plaintiff alleges that he has been put up for transfer to Kern Valley State Prison 26 …