Salazar

(PC) Bland v. Salazar

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20201:19-cv-01499California1,008 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA D. BLAND, Case No. 1:19-cv-01499-NONE-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF BE

DENIED

REUBEN A. SALAZAR II, (ECF No. 30) Defendant.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

Joshua Bland (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s claim against defendant Reuben A. Salazar II for violation of Plaintiff’s Fourteenth Amendment right to due process. (ECF No. 32). On September 25, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for injunctive relief. (ECF No. 30). For the reasons that follow, the Court will recommend that Plaintiff’s motion be denied. I. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION Plaintiff alleges that he has been put up for transfer to Kern Valley State Prison 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.