Schaupp

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CAROLYN SCHAUPP, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-01221-DAD-BAM 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFFS CAROLYN

9 v. SCHAUPP, SR., L.S., D.S., AND P.I.

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

10 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT

ORDER AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

11 Defendants.

12

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

13

14 This action was filed on August 28, 2020, asserting violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1984, 15 18 U.S.C. § 242, and various state law claims against Defendants County of Stanislaus, County of 16 Stanislaus Child Protective Services, Office of the District Attorney of Stanislaus County, Birgit 17 Fladager, Cristina Magana, City of Modesto, Modesto Police Department, Galen Carroll, Clinton 18 Armstrong, Kyle Johnson, Kathryn Harwell, Edwardo Cortez, Gary Boyd, Kim Mallock, Sandra 19 Lucas, Kimberly Underwood, Matthew Mercado, Frank Sousa, Edward Izzo, and Does 1-20. 20 (Doc. No. 1.) According to the complaint, the action is brought by Plaintiffs…