Advanced Steel Recovery, LLC v. X-Body Equipment, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADVANCED STEEL RECOVERY, LLC, No. 2:16-cv-00148-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER X-BODY EQUIPMENT, INC.; JEWELL
ATTACHMENTS, LLC,
15 Defendant.
17 Plaintiff Advanced Steel Recovery (ASR) moves for summary judgment (ECF No. 104), and defendants X-Body Equipment (X-Body) and Jewell Attachments’ (Jewell) move for reconsideration of the court’s claim construction (ECF No. 106) and reconsideration of the court’s denial of their prior motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 105). On January 20, 2020, the court heard argument on the motions. Mark Nielsen and C. Wook Pak appeared for plaintiffs; Robert Harkins appeared for defendants. Having considered the arguments of the parties, the moving papers, and the record before it, the court rules as detailed below. I. BACKGROUND On August 23, 2016, ASR filed its First Amended Complaint, alleging the defendants’ “Acculoader” product infringes U.S. Patent No. 9,056,731 (“the ‘731 Patent”). First…