(PS)Trinchitella

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONALD F. TRINCHITELLA, No. 2:15-cv-2365-KJM-EFB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 AMERICAN REALITY PARTNERS, LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default judgment was submitted for decision without oral 19 argument by the magistrate judge on March 13, 2020. The matter was referred to a United States 20 Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(19) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 21 On September 14, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which 22 contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be 23 filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 24 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 25 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed 26 de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law 27 by the magistrate judge are reviewed…