(PS)Trinchitella

(PS)Trinchitella v. Performance Realty Management, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20202:15-cv-02365California294 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD F. TRINCHITELLA, No. 2:15-cv-2365-KJM-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER AMERICAN REALITY PARTNERS, LLC, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default judgment was submitted for decision without oral argument by the magistrate judge on March 13, 2020. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(19) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On September 14, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.