Kernan

(PC) Harris v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20202:17-cv-00680California569 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WAYDE HOLLIS HARRIS, No. 2:17-cv-0680 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER S. KERNAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff requests that the court appoint counsel. In screening plaintiff’s pleading, the undersigned found that plaintiff may be able to demonstrate that Dr. Kuersten was deliberately indifferent to plaintiff’s serious medical needs by allegedly interfering with numerous recommendations of specialists concerning the diagnosis and treatment of plaintiff’s chronic GI symptoms, suffered over more than four years, which remain undiagnosed, by denying plaintiff’s primary care physicians’ requests based on recommendations by medical specialists, as well as by suggesting physical therapy for plaintiff’s tendon of his right thumb where the orthopedic specialist stated that “further nonoperative treatment would not be effective.” …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.