(PS) Dmitriy v. Eastern District Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20202:20-cv-00076California456 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 YEGOROV DMITRIY, No. 2:20-cv-0076 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FEDERAL COURT and EASTERN

DISTRICT,

15 Defendants, 17 Plaintiff Yegorov Dmitriy is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By order signed April 3, 2020 plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff was granted sixty days from the date of that order to file an amended complaint and was specifically cautioned that the failure to respond to the court’s order in a timely manner would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id. at 5.) The sixty-day period has expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner. Although it appears from the docket that plaintiff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.