(PS) Dmitriy v. Eastern District Court

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 YEGOROV DMITRIY, No. 2:20-cv-0076 KJM DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 FEDERAL COURT and EASTERN

DISTRICT,

15 16 Defendants, 17 18 Plaintiff Yegorov Dmitriy is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to 19 the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By order 20 signed April 3, 2020 plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff was granted leave to file an 21 amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff was granted 22 sixty days from the date of that order to file an amended complaint and was specifically cautioned 23 that the failure to respond to the court’s order in a timely manner would result in a 24 recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id. at 5.) The sixty-day period has expired, and 25 plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner. 26 Although it appears from the docket that plaintiff’s…