Kernan

(PC) Walker v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20202:17-cv-01764California1,444 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 G. DANIEL WALKER, No. 2:17-cv-1764 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SCOTT KERNAN, et al., Defendants. 14 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants conspired to retaliate against him because he named them as defendants in lawsuits. Presently before the court are plaintiff’s motions for legal materials. (ECF Nos. 38, 40.) By order dated May 26, 2020, this action was stayed for 120 days as part of the court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Pilot Program. (ECF No. 36.) A settlement conference is scheduled for November 3, 2020. (ECF No. 39.) Accordingly, the court will extend the stay through November 3, 2020. Plaintiff has filed two motions requesting that the court compel officials at California Health Care Facility (“CHCF”) to provide him with his legal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.