Leines

Leines v. Homeland Vinyl Products, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20202:18-cv-00969California2,853 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD A. LEINES, No. 2:18-cv-00969-KJM-DB Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. ORDER HOMELAND VINYL PRODUCTS, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant. 16 Defendant and counterclaimant Homeland Vinyl Products, Inc. (“Homeland”) moves for leave to amend its counterclaims. Mot., ECF No. 51. For the reasons below, the court GRANTS the motion to amend. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Richard Leines entered into a licensing agreement whereby Homeland could manufacture and sell certain deck construction products, called “Gorilla Lock,” that are purportedly based on an invention Leines patented. First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 27 ¶ 1. Homeland alleges Leines granted Homeland an exclusive license to manufacture and sell Gorilla Lock products throughout the United States. Proposed First Am. Counterclaims, ECF No. 53-1 ¶ 9. On April 19, 2018, plaintiff sued Homeland for breach of contract, breach of express…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.