(PC) Overton v. California Health Care Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20202:20-cv-00854California923 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL L. OVERTON, No. 2:20-cv-0854 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA HEALTH CARE

FACILITY,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges large sums of money are owed to him. In this order the court will address plaintiff’s motion for immediate release (ECF No. 11) and his failure to submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee. For the reasons set forth below the court will grant plaintiff one final opportunity to submit an in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee and deny his motion for immediate release. I. In Forma Pauperis In order to proceed with a civil action, plaintiff is required to either pay the filing fee or be granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a); see also Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). Plaintiff has not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.