Duncan

Duncan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20202:18-cv-01174California6,592 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAVEN DUNCAN, No. 2:18-cv-01174-KJM-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER STATE FARM MUTUAL

AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE

COMPANY, Defendant. 17 Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) moves for summary judgment. Mot. for Summ. J. (“MSJ”), ECF No. 26. Plaintiff Raven Duncan opposes. Opp’n, ECF No. 32. Defendant replied. Reply, ECF No. 40. The court heard argument on the motion on May 15, 2020 in a telephonic hearing, in light of the coronavirus pandemic. Rachel Renno appeared for plaintiff, Stephen Ellingson appeared for defendant. The court now GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the motion. I. BACKGROUND FACTS The following facts derive from both parties’ statements of undisputed facts, the parties’ responses to those statements, evidence cited in those statements, and the court’s review of the record. See Def.’s Statement of Undisputed Facts (Def.’s SUF), ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.