Saechao

(PC) Faultry v. Saechao

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20202:18-cv-01850California1,043 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES FAULTRY, No. 2:18-cv-1850 KJM AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER and 14 J. SAECHAO, et al., ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT

CONFERENCE

15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. §1983. 18 The court has determined that this case will benefit from a settlement conference. Therefore, this 19 case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota to conduct a settlement conference on 20 November 12, 2020 at 1:00 p.m. The settlement conference will be conducted by remote means, 21 to be determined at a later date and time. The Court will issue the necessary transportation order 22 in due course. 23 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. This case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Dennis M. 25 Cota on November 12, 2020 at 1:00 p.m. The settlement conference will be 26 conducted by remote means, to be determined at a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.