Winkfield

(PC) Hawkins v. Winkfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 13, 20202:19-cv-01228California1,377 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFF HAWKINS, No. 2:19-cv-1228 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. WINKFIELD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, and is currently housed at the California Health Care Facility. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 8, 2020, plaintiff filed a document styled, “Injunctive and Monetary Relief and Temporary Restraining Order.” (ECF No. 47.) As discussed below, plaintiff’s motion is denied without prejudice. I. Plaintiff’s Complaint Plaintiff alleges that on August 28, 2018, while housed at Mule Creek State Prison (“MCSP”), defendants Winkfield, Pendleton, Decker, Troncoso and Whipple used excessive force on plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 10 at 5.) Plaintiff seeks medical treatment and money damages. (ECF No. 10 at 6.) II. Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Relief In his motion, plaintiff requests injunctive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.