Winkfield
(PC) Hawkins v. Winkfield
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEFF HAWKINS, No. 2:19-cv-1228 TLN KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 M. WINKFIELD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, and is currently housed at the California 18 Health Care Facility. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 8, 2020, 19 plaintiff filed a document styled, “Injunctive and Monetary Relief and Temporary Restraining 20 Order.” (ECF No. 47.) As discussed below, plaintiff’s motion is denied without prejudice. 21 I. Plaintiff’s Complaint 22 Plaintiff alleges that on August 28, 2018, while housed at Mule Creek State Prison 23 (“MCSP”), defendants Winkfield, Pendleton, Decker, Troncoso and Whipple used excessive 24 force on plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 10 at 5.) Plaintiff seeks 25 medical treatment and money damages. (ECF No. 10 at 6.) 26 II. Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Relief 27 In his motion, plaintiff requests injunctive…