(PS) Kappia v. U.S. Department of Education

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOE MAMERY KAPPIA II, No. 2:19-cv-2091 MCE DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al., 15 16 Defendants, 17 18 Plaintiff Joe Kappia is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the 19 undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). By order 20 signed March 31, 2020, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and plaintiff was granted leave to 21 file an amended complaint that cured the defects noted in that order. (ECF No. 3.) Plaintiff was 22 granted sixty days from the date of that order to file the amended complaint and was specifically 23 cautioned that the failure to respond to the court’s order in a timely manner would result in a 24 recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id. at 5.) The sixty-day period has expired, and 25 plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order in any manner. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 Accordingly, IT…