Hernandez
Hernandez v. Bobst, North America, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL HERNANDEZ and BECKY Case No. 1:19-cv-00882-NONE-SKO
HERNANDEZ,
12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER
REGARDING REMOTE DEPOSITIONS
v. (Doc. 25) BOBST GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
Defendant.
17 _____________________________________/ 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for protective order regarding remote depositions, filed September 2, 2020 (the “Motion”). (Doc. 25.) Plaintiffs and Defendant filed their joint statement directed to the Motion, as required by this Court’s Local Rule 251, on September 23, 2020. (Doc. 29.) The Court reviewed the parties’ papers and all supporting material and found the matter suitable for decision without oral argument. The hearing set for September 30, 2020, was therefore vacated. (Doc. 30.) Having considered the parties’ briefing, and for the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be granted. /// /// 1 A. Factual Background On June 27, 2019, …