Hernandez

1

2 3 4 5 6 7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 MICHAEL HERNANDEZ and BECKY Case No. 1:19-cv-00882-NONE-SKO

HERNANDEZ,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 13 MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

REGARDING REMOTE DEPOSITIONS

14 v. (Doc. 25) 15 BOBST GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

16 Defendant.

17 _____________________________________/ 18 19 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ motion for protective order regarding 20 remote depositions, filed September 2, 2020 (the “Motion”). (Doc. 25.) Plaintiffs and Defendant 21 filed their joint statement directed to the Motion, as required by this Court’s Local Rule 251, on 22 September 23, 2020. (Doc. 29.) The Court reviewed the parties’ papers and all supporting 23 material and found the matter suitable for decision without oral argument. The hearing set for 24 September 30, 2020, was therefore vacated. (Doc. 30.) 25 Having considered the parties’ briefing, and for the reasons set forth below, the Motion 26 will be granted. 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 A. Factual Background 3 On June 27, 2019, …