(PC) Duncan v. California Healthcare Receivership Corp.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DIONTAE JOHAN DUNCAN, Case No. 1:20-cv-01288-SKO (PC)
12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A
13 v. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
14 CALIFORNIA HEALTHCARE (Doc. 3) RECEIVERSHIP CORP., et al., 15 14-DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 16 Clerk of the Court to assign a District Judge
17 On September 10, 2020, Plaintiff filed a document titled, “Order to Show Cause for a 18 Temporary Restraining Order.” (Doc. 3.) The Court construes the filing as a motion for a 19 temporary restraining order (TRO). For the reasons set forth below, the Court recommends that 20 the motion be denied. 21 I. DISCUSSION 22 “A preliminary injunction is an extraordinary remedy never awarded as of right.”1 Winter 23 v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008) (citation omitted). “A plaintiff seeking a 24 preliminary injunction must establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that…