Moore

(PC) Van Gessel v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20201:18-cv-01478California1,918 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 CHRISTOPHER ALLEN VAN GESSEL, 1:18-cv-01478-DAD-GSA-PC

12 Plaintiff, ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF

OPPORTUNITY TO WITHDRAW HIS

13 vs. OPPOSITIONS TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION

14 THOMAS MOORE, et al., TO DISMISS, AND FILE AMENDED

OPPOSITIONS IN LIGHT OF RAND NOTICE

15 Defendants.

THIRTY- DAY DEADLINE

16 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 Christopher Allen Van Gessel (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in 19 forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 20 U.S. 388 (1971) and the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). On July 9, 2020, 21 Defendants filed a motion to dismiss and a motion for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 24, 25.) 22 On July 23, 2020, Plaintiff filed a consolidated opposition to both of the motions. (ECF No. 27.) 23 On July 28, 2020, Defendants filed a reply to the consolidated opposition. (ECF No. 28.) 24 Defendants did not provide…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.