Petras

(PC) Martin v. Petras

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20202:19-cv-02075California4,811 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 O.Z. MARTIN, No. 2: 19-cv-2075 TLN KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ROBERT FOX, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel further responses to 19 requests for production of documents, requests for admissions and interrogatories. (ECF No. 28.) 20 For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motion to compel is granted in part and denied in part. 21 Background 22 This action proceeds on plaintiff’s original complaint as to defendants Petras, Haile, 23 Saukhla, Ditomas, Horch and Lewis. Plaintiff alleges that he has been diagnosed with Hepatitis 24 C since 1991. Plaintiff alleges that the California Department of Health Care Services HCV 25 Treatment Policy provides that individuals suffering from Stage 2 or greater hepatic fibrosis and 26 debilitating fatigue are candidates for HCV…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.