Polk

Polk v. Yee

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20202:18-cv-02900California317 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DELORES POLK, et al., No. 2:18-cv-2900-KJM-KJN

12 Plaintiffs, 13 ORDER v. 14 BETTY YEE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 On April 19, 2019, the court heard two motions to dismiss in this putative class 19 action based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See ECF Nos. 19 & 23. The motions were brought by 20 defendants Betty Yee, State Controller of California, and SEIU Local 2015 (“SEIU” or “Union”). 21 After hearing, the court submitted the motions. ECF No. 37. On August 24, 2020, the court 22 granted defendants’ motions to dismiss with leave to amend claims one and two, subject to the 23 pleading requirements of Federal Rule of Procedure 11. See generally Order, ECF No. 60. One 24 month later, plaintiffs have requested the court issue an appealable final judgment, noting they do 25 not intend to amend their First Amended Complaint, but rather intend to appeal its dismissal. 26 ECF No. 62, at 2. 27 The court having considered plaintiffs’ request, heard all persons properly 28 appearing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.