(PC) Concepcion v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20201:18-cv-01743California409 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHELLE (a/k/a MYCHAL) Case No. 1:18-cv-01743-NONE-JLT (PC)

CONCEPCION,

12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO v. FILE SUPPLEMENT TO MOTION TO 14 DISMISS

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

15 CORRECTIONS AND 30-DAY DEADLINE REHABILITATION, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff alleges that Defendants denied him sex reassignment surgery (SRS) in violation 19 of the Eighth Amendment, the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Patient Protection and Affordable 20 Care Act. (Doc. 15.) Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s 21 complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). (Doc. 27.) Plaintiff has filed an 22 opposition, to which Defendants have filed a reply. (Docs. 34, 38.) In their reply, Defendants state 23 that, after filing their motion, Plaintiff was approved for SRS, which “raises the question of 24 whether the Court has subject-matter jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s claim for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.