Ciolli

(PC) Mois v. Ciolli

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20201:20-cv-00885California381 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EMMANUEL MOIS, 1:20-cv-00885-JLT (PC)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

13 v. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

14 A. CIOLLI, et al., (Docs. 3, 7)

15 Defendants.

16 17 Pending are two motions filed by plaintiff seeking the appointment of counsel. Plaintiff 18 does not have a constitutional right to appointed counsel in this action, Rand v. Rowland, 113 19 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), and the court cannot require an attorney to represent plaintiff 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Mallard v. United States District Court for the Southern 21 District of Iowa, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). However, in certain exceptional circumstances the 22 court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to section 1915(e)(1). Rand, 113 23 F.3d at 1525. 24 Without a reasonable method of securing and compensating counsel, the court will seek 25 volunteer counsel only in the most serious and exceptional cases. In determining whether 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.