Truillo

(PC) Casey v. Truillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20201:20-cv-00560California761 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES ARTHUR CASEY, Case No. 1:20-cv-00560-DAD-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE

v. (ECF No. 19)

J. TRUILLO, et al., Defendants. James Arthur Casey (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on April 14, 2020. (ECF No. 1). On June 17, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it stated a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 14). The Court gave Plaintiff thirty days from the date of service of the order to either: “a. File a First Amended Complaint, which the Court will screen in due course; b. Notify the Court in writing that he does not want to file an amended complaint and instead wants to proceed only on his claim for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment against defendants Truillo, Garcia, Vera, Falcon, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.