(PS) Jinks-Matthews v. County of Contra Costa Child Support

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20202:19-cv-00572California304 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 OLUBUKANLA JINKS MATTHEWS, No. 2:19-cv-00572-TLN-EFB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA CHILD

SUPPORT; D CLEARY; MELINDA R.

15 SELF; GILBERT BOYD TARIN; and

ANITA SANTOS; S L SOTO,

16 Defendants. 17

18 19 Plaintiff Olubukanla Jinks Matthews (“Plaintiff”), an individual proceeding pro se, has 20 filed the above-entitled action. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge 21 pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 22 On September 23, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 23 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 24 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 6.) No objections have 25 been filed. 26 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 27 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 28 See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.