Juan

(PC) Barksdale v. Juan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20202:19-cv-02071California275 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLES BARKSDALE, No. 2:19-cv-02071 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER and FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 JUAN, et al., , 15 Defendants. 16 17 By an order filed August 5, 2020, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the 18 court, within sixty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendant. That sixty 19 day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order. 20 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall assign a district judge to this 21 case. 22 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 23 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.