(PC) Patterson v. HIP-C Committee

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20201:19-cv-01401California3,178 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VESTER L. PATTERSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-1401-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT A RESPONSE

v. (Doc. 10) JOHN DOES 1-18, et al., Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff has filed a first amended complaint asserting constitutional claims against governmental employees and/or entities.1 (Doc. 10.) Generally, the Court is required to screen complaints brought by inmates seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). “Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the 25 26 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.