(PC) Patterson v. HIP-C Committee

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20201:19-cv-01401California3,178 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VESTER L. PATTERSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-1401-JLT (PC)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT A RESPONSE

13 v. (Doc. 10) 14 JOHN DOES 1-18, et al., 15 Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

16 17 Plaintiff has filed a first amended complaint asserting constitutional claims against 18 governmental employees and/or entities.1 (Doc. 10.) Generally, the Court is required to screen 19 complaints brought by inmates seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or 20 employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint 21 or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail 22 to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant 23 who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). “Notwithstanding any filing fee, 24 or any portion thereof, that may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the 25 26 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.