Pringle
Pringle v. Walmart Distribution Center
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AL PRINGLE, Case No. 1:19-cv-00468-BAM Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED
v. FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO APPEAR
AND FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT
WALMART DISTRIBUTION CENTER, ORDER et al., (Doc. No. 38) Defendants.
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
13 On September 4, 2020, the Court granted the motion of Woosik Isaac Maing to withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff Al Pringle (“Plaintiff”), and substituted Plaintiff in propria persona. (Doc. No. 37.) By separate order, the Court set a telephonic status conference for October 15, 2020, to address whether Plaintiff had secured new counsel or intended to represent himself in propria persona. (Doc. No. 38.) A copy of the Court’s order setting the conference was served on Plaintiff at his last known address. On October 15, 2020, Plaintiff failed to appear at the telephonic status conference. Pursuant to Local Rule 110,…