Slote

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIMBERLY R. OLSON, No. 2:16-cv-956-KJM-EFB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 PATRICIA SLOTE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On September 25, 2020, the court recommended plaintiff’s first amended complaint be 18 dismissed without leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).1 The clerk’s office timely 19 received objections to the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff also submitted a declaration 20 that states “File Under Seal.” The court construes this statement as a request by plaintiff to file 21 her declaration under seal. Because plaintiff has not complied with the rules for a request to file 22 documents under seal it must be denied. 23 Courts have recognized “a general right to inspect and copy public records and 24 documents, including judicial records and documents.” Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 25 U.S. 589 (1978). “Unless a particular court record is one ‘traditionally kept secret,’ a ‘strong 26 presumption in favor of access’ is…