Martinez

(PC) Bledsoe v. Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20202:18-cv-02710California1,165 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONNEL BLEDSOE, Sr., No. 2:18-cv-2710 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SGT. MARTINEZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, with a civil rights action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 30, 2020, plaintiff moved to recuse the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 144. (ECF No. 56). As discussed below, plaintiff’s motion is denied. I. Legal Standards Federal law provides that a party may seek recusal of a judge based on bias or prejudice. Whenever a party to any proceeding in a district court makes and files a timely and sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or prejudice either against him or in favor of any adverse party, such judge shall proceed no further therein, but another judge shall be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.