Krauss

Krauss v. Walmart, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20202:19-cv-00838California4,660 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 Aaron T. Winn (SBN 229763) Sarah A. Gilbert (SBN 312865) 2 Natalie F. Hrubos (PA State Bar No. 307255) Admitted Pro Hac Vice 3

DUANE MORRIS LLP

4 750 B Street, Suite 2900 San Diego, CA 92101-4681 5 Telephone: 619.744.2200 atwinn@duanemorris.com 6 sagilbert@duanemorris.com 7 nfhrubos@duanemorris.com

8 Attorneys for Defendants Walmart Inc. and Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. 9

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

13 HOPE KRAUSS, aka, DEONTE KRAUSS, No. 2:19-cv-0838 JAM DB individually and on behalf of all those 14 similarly situated, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

ORDER

15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 WAL-MART, INC., a Delaware corporation; 18 WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., a 19 Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 20 21 Defendants.

22 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 23 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 24 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 25 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 26 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.