McMahon

(PS) Avila v. McMahon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20202:18-cv-00163California6,609 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID ANTHONY AVILA, No. 2:18-cv-00163 JAM AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS M.D. McMAHON, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and the case was accordingly referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). The last remaining defendant in this case, M.D. McMahon, has moved for summary judgment. ECF No. 79. Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion (ECF No. 88) and an objection to the motion (ECF No. 87). Defendant replied. ECF No. 89. For the reasons explained below, defendant’s motion should be GRANTED. I. Complaint and Procedural Background Plaintiff brought this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and California law, alleging violations of plaintiff’s rights during a traffic stop and subsequent arrest. Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) is the currently operative pleading. ECF No. 61. Plaintiff alleges that on January 28, 2016,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.