(PC) Colbourn v. California Courts

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20202:20-cv-00725California318 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ORRIN TYLER COLBOURN, No. 2:20-cv-0725 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA COURTS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 15, 2020, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (See ECF No. 33). Plaintiff has filed belated objections to the findings and recommendations, which despite their lateness the court has considered. (ECF No. 40.) The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.