Steber
(PS) Cepeda v. Steber
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID DANIEL CEPEDA, No. 2:20-cv-01320 KJM AC (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER MOLLY J. STEBER, Sacramento County District Attorney’s Office, 15 Defendant.
17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On July 7, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff has moved to disqualify the magistrate judge, ECF No. 4; the court has reviewed this motion and finds it is without support. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are…