Borges

(PC) Burghardt v. Borges

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20201:17-cv-01433California735 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 DARRYL BURGHARDT, 1:17-cv-01433-AWI-GSA-PC

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

13 v. RECONSIDERATION (ECF No. 23.) 14 L. BORGES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. BACKGROUND 18 Darryl Burghardt (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 19 with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 25, 2017, Plaintiff filed 20 the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) 21 On August 20, 2020, the undersigned issued an order adopting the Magistrate Judge’s 22 findings and recommendations, dismissing Plaintiff’s claims against defendants Borges, 23 Renteria, Montoya, Osuma, Gomez, and Gonzales from this action for failure to state a claim, 24 with leave to amend; and dismissing all other claims from this action as unrelated claims under 25 Rule 18(a), without prejudice to filing new cases to bring those claims. (ECF No. 23.) 26 On September 11, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the August 20, 27 2020 order. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.