Rhodes

(PC) Hollins v. Rhodes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20201:20-cv-00692California4,999 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONALD E. HOLLINS, Lead Case: 1:20-cv-00692-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, Member Case: 1:20-cv-00775-DAD-EPG (PC) v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

D. RHODES, et al.,

DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

Defendants. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE

TO PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER

17 (1:20-cv-00692-DAD-EPG (PC) ECF NO. 1)

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

19 Plaintiff Donald E. Hollins (“Plaintiff”) is a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed two substantially similar actions, each of which concerned being denied non-contact visits as a result of an earlier arrest. The first, case number 1:20-cv-00692-EPG (PC) (“692 Case”), was filed on May 18, 2020. (692 Case ECF No. 1). The second, case number 1:20-cv-0775-BAM (PC) (“775 Case”), was filed June 3, 2020 (775…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.