Rhodes

(PC) Hollins v. Rhodes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20201:20-cv-00692California4,999 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONALD E. HOLLINS, Lead Case: 1:20-cv-00692-DAD-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, Member Case: 1:20-cv-00775-DAD-EPG (PC) 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

14 D. RHODES, et al.,

DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR

15 Defendants. FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE

TO PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE TO

16 COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER

17 (1:20-cv-00692-DAD-EPG (PC) ECF NO. 1) 18

TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

19 20 Plaintiff Donald E. Hollins (“Plaintiff”) is a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma 21 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed two substantially 22 similar actions, each of which concerned being denied non-contact visits as a result of an earlier 23 arrest. The first, case number 1:20-cv-00692-EPG (PC) (“692 Case”), was filed on May 18, 2020. 24 (692 Case ECF No. 1). The second, case number 1:20-cv-0775-BAM (PC) (“775 Case”), was 25 filed June 3, 2020 (775…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.