Quick

(PC) Jackson v. Quick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20201:19-cv-01591California523 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 CORNEL JACKSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01591-NONE-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 13 FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 JASON QUICK, et al., (ECF NO. 28)

15

Defendants.

16

17 18 Cornel Jackson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action 19 filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 On October 16, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of pro bono counsel. (ECF 21 No. 28). Plaintiff asks for appointment of counsel because he is unable to afford counsel; because 22 his incarceration has greatly limited his ability to litigate; because the issues involved in this case 23 are complex and will require significant research and investigation; because Plaintiff has no 24 access to a law library; because Defendants refuse to provide legal information or materials; and 25 Plaintiff has no knowledge of the law; and Plaintiff has limited formal education and reading 26 disabilities. Plaintiff also states that a trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.