Quick
(PC) Jackson v. Quick
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 CORNEL JACKSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01591-NONE-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL, v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE 14 JASON QUICK, et al., (ECF NO. 28)
Defendants.
17 Cornel Jackson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 16, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of pro bono counsel. (ECF No. 28). Plaintiff asks for appointment of counsel because he is unable to afford counsel; because his incarceration has greatly limited his ability to litigate; because the issues involved in this case are complex and will require significant research and investigation; because Plaintiff has no access to a law library; because Defendants refuse to provide legal information or materials; and Plaintiff has no knowledge of the law; and Plaintiff has limited formal education and reading disabilities. Plaintiff also states that a trial…