C.D.C.R.

(PC) Ivory v. C.D.C.R.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20202:20-cv-01819California2,215 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONTA DEON IVORY, No. 2:20-cv-1819 KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 CDCR, R. BURTON,1 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 18 § 1983, and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. This 19 proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 As discussed below, the undersigned defers consideration of plaintiff’s request to proceed 21 in forma pauperis, because this action must be dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to first 22 exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing the instant action. 23 I. Screening Standards 24 The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 25 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The 26

27 1 In his complaint, plaintiff names both…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.