Timmerman Starlite Trucking, Inc. v. Ingredion Incorporated

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20202:19-cv-01876California3,046 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIMMERMAN STARLITE TRUCKING, No. 2:19-cv-01876-JAM-AC

INC.,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

INGREDION INCORPORATED,

15 Defendant.

17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for discovery. ECF No. 22. The parties submitted the required joint statement. ECF No. 27. The matter was submitted on the papers. ECF Nos. 23, 26. Based on a review of the parties’ arguments and the record as a whole, the motion to compel is GRANTED. Defendant is ORDERED to turn over all responsive documents within ten (10) days of this order. Because plaintiff brought a meritorious motion to compel, the court GRANTS its request for attorney’s fees, though in a reduced amount to comply with the standard rates of this district. The court awards plaintiffs’ attorney’s fees in the amount of $6,679, to be paid within 10 days of this order. I. Introduction and Relevant Background Plaintiff Timmerman Starlite Trucking, Inc. (“Starlite”) is a California…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.