Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:17-cv-00608-MCE-EFB Plaintiff, v. ORDER MELISSA A. HILL; ZENITH GROUP; TOWN OF PARADISE; and BUTTE COUNTY TREASURER, Defendants. 17 On September 11, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 35. No objections were filed.1 Accordingly, the Court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). /// 26 Although it appears from the file that defendant Hill’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, defendant was properly served. It is a party’s responsibility to keep the court apprised…