Hill

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:17-cv-00608-MCE-EFB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MELISSA A. HILL; ZENITH GROUP; TOWN OF PARADISE; and BUTTE 15 COUNTY TREASURER, 16 Defendants. 17 18 On September 11, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 19 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 20 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 35. No objections were 21 filed.1 22 Accordingly, the Court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United 23 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 24 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 25 /// 26 1 Although it appears from the file that defendant Hill’s copy of the findings and 27 recommendations was returned, defendant was properly served. It is a party’s responsibility to keep the court apprised…