(PC) Salcedo v. Shasta County Sheriff
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTIN CORTES SALCEDO, No. 2:19-cv-2627-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SHASTA COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Currently before the court is plaintiff’s September 14, 2020 motion for a temporary restraining order. ECF No. 29. For the reasons that follow, the motion must be denied. I. Motion for Temporary Restraining Order Plaintiff’s motion takes the form of a single-page letter to the court in which he states that defendant Cortez has been coming to his jail cell and threatening him. ECF No. 29. The letter was filed directly by plaintiff, although he is represented by counsel in this action. Although plaintiff’s filings and communications with the court must be through his counsel, the court will rule on…