(PC) Salcedo v. Shasta County Sheriff
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARTIN CORTES SALCEDO, No. 2:19-cv-2627-EFB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SHASTA COUNTY SHERIFF, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(c). Currently before the court is plaintiff’s September 14, 2020 motion for a 20 temporary restraining order. ECF No. 29. For the reasons that follow, the motion must be 21 denied. 22 I. Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 23 Plaintiff’s motion takes the form of a single-page letter to the court in which he states that 24 defendant Cortez has been coming to his jail cell and threatening him. ECF No. 29. The letter 25 was filed directly by plaintiff, although he is represented by counsel in this action. Although 26 plaintiff’s filings and communications with the court must be through his counsel, the court will 27 rule on…