Kerner

(PS) Wade v. Kerner

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 21, 20202:20-cv-01791California2,045 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 E. K. WADE, No. 2:20–cv–1791–KJM–KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

13 v. (ECF Nos. 2, 14) 14 HENRY J. KERNER and ROBERT

MUELLER,

15 Defendants. 16 17 On September 4, 2020, plaintiff simultaneously filed a motion for preliminary injunction 18 and a complaint against Henry Kerner and Robert Mueller in their individual capacities.1 (ECF 19 No. 1 at 1; ECF No. 2.) On September 30, 2020, plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint again 20 naming in their individual capacities Mr. Kerner, the current Special Counsel for the United 21 States Office of Special Counsel, and Mr. Mueller, former Special Counsel for the United States 22 Department of Justice.2 (ECF No. 9 at 1-3.) On October 16, 2020, plaintiff filed a “Motion to 23

24 1 Because plaintiff is appearing pro se, this action proceeds before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 25

2 On October 13, 2020, plaintiff also filed a Second Amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.